Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Risk Assessment of Electromagnetic-Field Exposure in Heterogeneous Indoor Networks: Comparative Measurements and Modeling for Wi-Fi, 5G and Bluetooth

Winner Minah- Eeba, Solomon Malcolm Ekolama

Abstract


The widespread deployment of Wi-Fi, 5G, and Bluetooth has raised concerns regarding cumulative radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure in everyday environments. This study assesses combined RF-EMF exposure from these technologies under indoor and outdoor conditions and evaluates compliance with international safety guidelines. Environmental exposure was quantified using field measurements of electric field strength and corresponding power density, while localized exposure from personal devices was assessed using specific absorption rate (SAR) data. Measured indoor power density values ranged from 0.02 to 0.06 W/m² for Wi-Fi and 0.03 to 0.15 W/m² for 5G, resulting in a maximum combined exposure of approximately 0.12 W/m², which is well below the ICNIRP public limit of 10 W/m². Localized SAR values were 0.8 W/kg for smartphones, 0.04 W/kg for Bluetooth earbuds, and 0.02 W/kg for smartwatches, all below the 2 W/kg ICNIRP limit. These results indicate that 5G dominates environmental exposure, while smartphones dominate localized exposure, and that cumulative RF-EMF exposure from Wi-Fi, 5G, and Bluetooth remains within international safety limits under normal operating conditions.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Chiaraviglio, L., Elzanaty, A., & Alouini, M. S. (2021). Health risks associated with 5G exposure: A view from the communications engineering perspective. IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 2, 2131-2179.

Chen, Z., Yu, S., Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Yu, J., ... & Zhang, J. (2023). C, F co-doping Ag/TiO2 with visible light photocatalytic performance toward degrading Rhodamine B. Environmental Research, 232, 116311.

Frank, J. W. (2025). Epidemiological criteria for causation applied to human health harms from RF-EMF exposure: Bradford Hill revisited. Frontiers in public health, 13, 1559868.

Karipidis, K., Mate, R., Urban, D., Tinker, R., & Wood, A. (2021). 5G mobile networks and health—a state-of-the-science review of the research into low-level RF fields above 6 GHz. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 31(4), 585-605.

Rathebe, P. C., & Kholopo, M. (2026). Low-Cost Sensors in 5G RF-EMF Exposure Monitoring: Validity and Challenges. Sensors, 26(2), 533.

Beach, M. A., Laughlin, L., Arabi, E., Wilson, S., Ozan, S., & Gamlath, C. (2020, March). Enabling RF technologies for spectrum sharing. In 2020 14th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

Cao, Z., & Lu, M. (2025). Advancements in Wearable Antenna Design: A Comprehensive Review of Materials, Fabrication Techniques, and Future Trends in Wireless Communication. Micromachines, 16(9), 1028.

Leeman, M., Wydaeghe, R., Van der Straeten, J., Goegebeur, S., Vermeeren, G., & Joseph, W. (2025). City-scale spatio-temporal modeling of 5G downlink exposure of users and non-users by ray-tracing in a real urban environment. IEEE Access, 13, 30894-30906.

Ziegelberger, G., Croft, R., Feychting, M., Green, A. C., Hirata, A., d'Inzeo, G., ... & Watanabe, S. (2020). Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health physics, 118(5), 483-524.

Foster, K. R. (2022). Electromagnetic fields and human health: The continuing controversy. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 24, 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-112420-091856.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.