Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Examination of UPS Reliability Predictions and EMC Simulation

Rajesh Shukla

Abstract


The plan rehearsals used in Power Electronics are essentially minimally normalized. But, despite of the finest planned geography that is being given, field disappointments are found to be high in the real world. Consequently, inadequate planning and other relevant engineering practices, such as reliability and energy management in the early stages of a plan, can lead to disappointments in the end, especially in India. Program teams are more accustomed to delivering the product ahead of schedule, eschewing careful planning for prevention appraisal-based exercises like modeling, prognostics, demonstration, EMC simulation, and prediction, among other techniques, which results in customer dissatisfaction and firefighting. The entire EMC reproduction process will be considered in this study. Pspice, the model designed for Surge, will be subjected to an analogous electronic circuit impact analysis. Applying flood allows us to observe the effects of the flood module before implementing it in the power circuit equipment models. The probability that something can perform its intended function for a specified amount of time under specified conditions is known as its unwavering quality. The expectation models that are used have many boundaries and contrasts with one another, which makes them accurate. Several expectation models for UPS will be read up on in this work. With relex programming seat checking of models as for UPS, dependable quality models like 217 or more, Bellcore/Telcordia, and IEC62380 at different mission profiles will be completed.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ghfiri, C., Boyer, A., Bensoussan, A., Durier, A., & Dhia, S. B. (2018). A new methodology for EMC prediction of integrated circuits after aging. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 61(2), 572-581.

Neumayer, R., Stelzer, A., Haslinger, F., Held, J., Schinco, F., & Weigel, R. (2003, August). Continuous simulation of system-level automotive EMC problems. In 2003 IEEE Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Symposium Record (Cat. No. 03CH37446) (Vol. 1, pp. 409-413). IEEE.

Dhia, S. B., Ramdani, M., & Sicard, E. (Eds.). (2006). Electromagnetic Compatibility of Integrated Circuits: Techniques for low emission and susceptibility. Springer Science & Business Media.

Parry, J., Bailey, C., & Aldham, C. (2000, May). Multiphysics modelling for electronics design. In ITHERM 2000. The Seventh Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (Cat. No. 00CH37069) (Vol. 2, pp. 86-93). IEEE.

Li, E. P., Wei, X. C., Cangellaris, A. C., Liu, E. X., Zhang, Y. J., D'amore, M., ... & Sudo, T. (2010). Progress review of electromagnetic compatibility analysis technologies for packages, printed circuit boards, and novel interconnects. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 52(2), 248-265.

Zolfagharian, A., Khosravani, M. R., & Kaynak, A. (2020). Fracture resistance analysis of 3D-printed polymers. Polymers, 12(2), 302.

Weber, S. P., Hoene, E., Guttowski, S., John, W., & Reichl, H. (2004, June). Modeling induction machines for EMC-analysis. In 2004 IEEE 35th Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37551) (Vol. 1, pp. 94-98). IEEE.

Khor, C. Y., Abdullah, M. Z., Tan, H. T., Leong, W. C., & Ramdan, D. (2012). Investigation of the fluid/structure interaction phenomenon in IC packaging. Microelectronics Reliability, 52(1), 241-252.

Kharanaq, F. A., Emadi, A., & Bilgin, B. (2020). Modeling of conducted emissions for EMI analysis of power converters: State-of-the-art review. IEEE Access, 8, 189313-189325.

Cavka, D., Mora, N., & Rachidi, F. (2013). A comparison of frequency-dependent soil models: Application to the analysis of grounding systems. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 56(1), 177-187.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.