Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Geocell and Discrete-Fiber Reinforcement of Granular Soils: A Review of Strength, Stiffness and Deformation Behaviour

Harshit Sharma, Dr. Harsh Rathore

Abstract


Weak granular soils frequently possess inadequate shear strength, low stiffness and excessive deformation characteristics, limiting their suitability for foundations, pavements, embankments and retaining structures. Geocells and randomly distributed discrete fibers have emerged as effective reinforcement techniques for improving the engineering behaviour of such soils. This paper reviews previous laboratory, numerical, field and model investigations concerning geocell-reinforced, fiber-reinforced and composite-reinforced soil systems. Geocells improve soil performance through three-dimensional confinement, lateral restraint, stress redistribution and enhanced particle interlocking. Their effectiveness is influenced by cell geometry, reinforcement stiffness, infill density, embedment depth and loading conditions. Randomly distributed fibers develop tensile resistance through friction and mechanical interaction with soil particles, thereby increasing apparent cohesion, post-peak strength, ductility and energy absorption. Fiber performance depends strongly on length, content, aspect ratio, material type and soil density. Previous studies demonstrate that geocells generally provide greater bearing-capacity and settlement improvements than planar or randomly distributed reinforcement. However, fibers offer multidirectional reinforcement and improved ductility. Combining geocell confinement with discrete fibers can generate a beneficial composite mechanism in which global lateral restraint and local tensile bridging act simultaneously. The review identifies the need for additional studies on moisture effects, cyclic loading, durability, sustainable reinforcement materials and field-scale composite applications.


Full Text:

PDF PDF

References


Adams, T. M., and Collin, J. G. (1997). “Large model spread footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil foundations.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 123, 66–72.

Ahmad, F., Bateni, F., and Azmi, M. (2010). “Performance evaluation of silty sand reinforced with fibers.” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 28, 93–99.

Al-Refeai, T. O. (1991). “Behavior of granular soils reinforced with discrete randomly oriented inclusion.” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 10, 319–333.

Al-Refeai, T. O. (1992). “Model tests on strip footing on reinforced sand.” Journal of King Saud University, 4, 155–169.

Kaniraj, S. R., and Gayathri, V. (2003). “Geotechnical behavior of fly ash mixed with randomly oriented fiber inclusions.” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 21, 123–149.

Khedkar, M. S., and Mandal, J. N. (2009). “Behaviour of cellular reinforced sand under triaxial loading conditions.” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 27, 645–658.

Khing, K. H., Das, B. M., Puri, V. K., Cook, E. E., and Yen, S. C. (1993). “The bearing capacity of a strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand.” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 12, 351–361.

Krishnaswamy, N. R., Rajagopal, K., and Latha, G. M. (2000). “Model studies on geocell-supported embankments constructed over a soft clay foundation.” Geotechnical Testing Journal, 23(1), 45–54.

Kumar, A., Walia, B. S., and Mohan, J. (2006). “Compressive strength of fiber-reinforced highly compressible clay.” Construction and Building Materials, 20, 1063–1068.

Lambert, S., Nicot, F., and Gotteland, P. (2011). “Uniaxial compressive behavior of scrapped-tire and filled wire-netted geocell with a geotextile envelope.” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29, 483–490.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.