Utilization of Brick Dust and Rice Husk Ash for Sustainable Cement Replacement in M20 and M25 Grade Concrete
Abstract
The study evaluates the influence of replacing cement with Fly Ash, Brick Dust, and Rice Husk Ash on the compressive strength of concrete. Cement replacement was conducted at varying percentages (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, and 40%) for M20 and M25 grade concrete, and compressive strength was assessed at 7, 28, 90, and 180 days. The results demonstrate that partial cement replacement can achieve comparable or improved strength performance up to an optimal level, beyond which strength reduction occurs.
For M20 grade concrete, the highest 28-day compressive strength of 43.94 MPa was recorded at 5% Fly Ash replacement, surpassing the control mix (43.46 MPa). Similarly, Brick Dust replacement at 5% resulted in a peak 28-day strength of 44.94 MPa, while Rice Husk Ash exhibited an optimum replacement level of 5%, achieving 44.42 MPa. However, higher replacement levels beyond 20% led to a decline in strength.
For M25 grade concrete, the optimal 28-day strength of 52.60 MPa was obtained at 10% Fly Ash replacement, while 5% Brick Dust replacement resulted in a peak strength of 50.00 MPa. In contrast, Rice Husk Ash replacement showed the highest strength of 50.38 MPa at 5% replacement. A steady decline was observed beyond 20% replacement, indicating a threshold limit for effective utilization of these supplementary cementitious materials.
The study concludes that partial cement replacement using industrial and agricultural by-products can enhance concrete sustainability without compromising strength. This research contributes to the development of cost-effective and environmentally friendly construction materials suitable for sustainable infrastructure.
References
Singh, A., Verma, R., & Chauhan, S. (2025). Influence of Class F fly ash on mechanical and durability characteristics of M30 concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 410, 134929.
Kumar, P., & Reddy, B. (2024). Development of sustainable geopolymer concrete using fly ash and alkaline activators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 393, 139045.
Zhao, X., Li, J., & Wang, Y. (2023). Effect of high-volume fly ash on chloride ion permeability of concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 138, 105236.
Gupta, N., & Das, P. (2023). Combined effect of fly ash and GGBS on sulfate resistance of concrete. Materials Today: Proceedings, 72, 351–358.
Patil, R., & Joshi, K. (2022). Performance of self-compacting concrete incorporating fly ash and silica fume. International Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 10(2), 45–51.
Chen, L., Hu, S., & Lin, Y. (2021). Nano-modified fly ash-based cement composites for improved early-age strength. Construction Materials and Structures, 25(4), 765–773.
Raj, V., & Prasad, D. (2020). Application of fly ash in subgrade stabilization for sustainable road construction. Transportation Infrastructure Engineering, 7(3), 201–209.
Gupta, D., Singh, R., & Mehta, P. (2025). Influence of ultrafine rice husk ash on mechanical and durability properties of M40 concrete. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials, 19(1), 45–52.
Nayak, P., & Sharma, K. (2024). Durability performance of hybrid RHA–fly ash blended concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 406, 130122.
Ali, F., & Verma, N. (2023). Effect of rice husk ash on high-performance concrete under marine exposure. Cement and Concrete Composites, 135, 105105.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.