Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparison of Non-Isolated and Base-Isolated RCC Moment Resisting Framed High-Rise Buildings

Ramhari Shrestha, Anjana Khatiwada, Govinda Gautam, Hridhdi Singh Shrestha, Susmita Giri

Abstract


Seismic isolation has emerged as an effective strategy for improving the earthquake resilience of high-rise buildings, particularly in seismically active regions such as Nepal. This study investigates the influence of lead rubber bearing (LRB) base-isolation systems on the seismic performance of a fourteen-story reinforced concrete moment-resisting frame by comparing a conventional fixed-base model with a base-isolated model designed and analyzed in ETABS 2021 in accordance with IS 1893:2016, IS 456:2000, and IS 875 using response spectrum analysis. Key seismic response parameters, including the fundamental time period, base shear, lateral displacement, inter-story drift, and floor acceleration, were evaluated, and the results revealed a significant enhancement in the seismic performance owing to base isolation. The incorporation of LRBs increased the fundamental time period by approximately 2.5 times, thereby shifting the structural response away from the dominant ground motion frequencies, which led to a reduction in the base shear of nearly 70%, along with substantial decreases in inter-story drifts, floor accelerations, and top-story displacements. Furthermore, the base-isolated structure requires smaller structural member sizes, indicating improved structural efficiency and effective energy dissipation with controlled flexibility. These findings confirm that LRB base-isolation systems significantly reduce both structural and nonstructural damage during earthquakes and represent a reliable, high-performance seismic mitigation strategy for high-rise buildings, particularly for critical infrastructure and densely populated commercial buildings, where safety and post-earthquake functionality are essential.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bilham, R. (2015). Seismology: Raising Kathmandu. Nature, 522(7555), 285–287. https://doi.org/10.1038/522285a

Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). (2000). IS 456: Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code of Practice. New Delhi, India: Author.

Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). (2016). IS 1893 (Part 1): Criteria for Earthquake-resistant Design of Structures (Seventh Revision). New Delhi, India: Author.

Chopra, A. K. (2017). Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering (5th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Gautam, D., & Chaulagain, H. (2016). Structural performance and associated lessons from the 2015 Gorkha (Nepal) Earthquake. Engineering Failure Analysis, 68, 222–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.06.002

Kelly, J. M. (1997). Earthquake-Resistant Design with Rubber (2nd ed.). London, UK: Springer.

Naeim F., Kelly J. M. (1999). Design of Seismically Isolated Structures: Theory to Practice. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc..

Pandey, B., Sharma, K., & Gautam, D. (2018). Seismic vulnerability assessment of existing RC buildings in Nepal. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 22(5), 835–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1257082

Skinner, R. I., Robinson, W. H., & McVerry, G. H. (1993). Introduction to Seismic Isolation. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Usta, P. (2021). Investigation of the effects of a base-isolator system on the seismic behavior of a historical structure. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 25(12), 678–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1712436

Wu, T. C. (2001). Design of Base Isolation System for Buildings (Master’s Thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Indian Standards Bureau (1987a). IS 875 (Part 1): 1987 – Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquakes) for buildings and structures, Part 1: Dead loads – Unit weights of building and stored materials. New Delhi, India: Author.

Indian Standards Bureau (1987b). IS 875 (Part 2): 1987 – Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquakes) for buildings and structures, Part 2: Imposed loads. New Delhi, India: Author.

Indian Standards Bureau (IS) (2016). IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016 – Criteria for earthquake-resistant design of structures, Part 1: General provisions and buildings (sixth revision). New Delhi, India: Author.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.