Design and Evaluation of a Fog-Enhanced IoT Framework for Real-Time Health Monitoring in Rural Clinics
Abstract
The increasing burden on rural healthcare systems highlights the urgent need for affordable, real-time patient monitoring solutions. Traditional cloud-based Internet of Things (IoT) architectures face significant limitations in such contexts, including high latency, unreliable connectivity, and bandwidth constraints, which can compromise timely clinical decision-making. To address these challenges, this study proposes a fog-enhanced IoT framework tailored for rural clinics. The framework integrates patient-side IoT devices, local fog nodes, and a cloud backend, enabling real-time data processing closer to the source while maintaining long-term storage and advanced analytics in the cloud. The research adopts a design–evaluation approach. The proposed architecture is modelled and simulated using iFogSim, with performance measured against conventional cloud-only systems. Key evaluation metrics include latency, bandwidth utilization, energy consumption, and system reliability. Preliminary results indicate that the fog-enhanced system significantly reduces latency, optimizes bandwidth use, and improves service availability compared to cloud-only alternatives. A case scenario involving vital signs monitoring (heart rate, oxygen saturation, and ECG) demonstrates the framework’s effectiveness in supporting timely interventions for rural patients. The study contributes to the growing field of healthcare IoT by presenting a holistic and resource-efficient solution for underserved regions. Findings underscore the potential of fog computing to bridge healthcare disparities, while recommendations highlight future integration with artificial intelligence for predictive analytics and blockchain for secure medical data management.
References
Ahmadi, Z., Haghi Kashani, M., Nikravan, M., & Mahdipour, E. (2021). Fog-based healthcare systems: A systematic review. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(30), 36361–36400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11227-x
Al-Majeed, S., & Al-Radaideh, Q. (2021). Internet of Things applications in healthcare: A review of empirical evidence. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 150, 104431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104431
Al-Rawashdeh, M., Keikhosrokiani, P., Belaton, B., Alawida, M., & Zwiri, A. (2022). IoT Adoption and Application for Smart Healthcare: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 22(14), 5377. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22145377
Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., & Addepalli, S. (2014). Fog computing and its role in the internet of things. Proceedings of the First Edition of the MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing, 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2342509.2342513
Chang, C., Kuo, Y., & Chen, L. (2016). Reliability modeling of fog-assisted healthcare systems. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 65(3), 1253–1262. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2016.2588425
Elhadad, A., Alanazi, F., Taloba, A. I., & Abozeid, A. (2022). Fog Computing Service in the Healthcare Monitoring System for Managing the Real-Time Notification. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2022, Article 5337733. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5337733 PMCID: PMC8941505
Elmi, A. A., Abdullahi, M. O., & Abdullahi, H. O. (2024). Internet of Things in Telemedicine: A Systematic Review of Current Trends and Future Directions. IIETA: I2M. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.18280/i2m.230606
Gupta, H., Dastjerdi, A. V., Ghosh, S. K., & Buyya, R. (2017). iFogSim: A toolkit for modeling and simulation of resource management techniques in the Internet of Things, edge and fog computing environments. Software: Practice and Experience, 47(9), 1275–1296. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2509
Hong, K., Lilley, M., & Taal, P. (2013). Bandwidth optimization in fog computing systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(8), 1989–1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.02.011
Islam, S. M. R., Kwak, D., Kabir, M. H., Hossain, M., & Kwak, K. S. (2015). The Internet of Things for health care: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access, 3, 678–708. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2437951
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.